Butdoes not have a writtenapplication, yousaid that youwent to the bankto urgemanytimes, yourevidence?
而没有书面的一个申请,你说你去银行催了好多次,那你的证据呢?Nowmanypeople are very careful, whymustmeetto chat, regardless ofbecause the telephone conversationsound recordingchatted the record to treat as the evidenceto use.
要知道,现在很多人都很小心,为什么要见面聊,因为无论通话录音还是聊天记录都可以当做证据来用。Thereforeaccording towhomadvocatedprinciple that whopresents evidence, youmustshow that saidyouandothershave said.
所以根据谁主张谁举证的原则,你得证明说你和别人说过了。Listens to the feelingto be very incoherent, butthisis the reality.
听着感觉很拗口,但这就是现实。But after producingthisevidence , the situationwas different, myhereregards asyouto knowormustknow, ifyoucannot produce the evidenceto show that youandIhave explained that Ioccupy the principle.
而拿出这份证据后情况就不同了,我这边视为你们知道或者应当知道,你们如果拿不出证据来证明你们和我解释过,那我就是占理了。InitiallysideXiaoyingthehand-writtenshowingwas disregardeddirectly, evencansay,without the eyes of Directorpermits, looksafter all was very nonstandard.
当初方小莹的这份手写说明直接被无视了,甚至可以说,都没进了许主任的眼,毕竟看着就很不标准。Probably the childdoodleis ordinary.
像是小孩涂鸦一般。sideXiaoyingalsowithout the means that triescasually, behindwould have noto be serious, finallysideDazhuangafterknowingto havethisthing, from5000changed to20,000money that the requestcompensateddirectly......
方小莹也是没办法了,随便试了试,后面就没当回事了,结果方大状在知道有这东西后,直接把要求赔偿的钱从五千改成了两万……Yes, sideDazhuanghad not wantedso manyto comebeforeeven.
是的,之前就算是方大状也没想要这么多来着。In such a case, duplicate/restoresKangZhihangis certainly impossiblespeciallyto send a writteninformingletterto givesideXiaoyingto explain that becausetheyare impossibleto explain,thismatterdid pass onthatalso to?
在这样的情况下,复康支行当然不可能专门发一份书面的告知函来给方小莹解释的,因为他们不可能解释,这事传出去那还得了?
The focus that alsotherefore, both sidesdisputedlay intwo;first, creditrecordwhetherwas the reputationcontent, itstwowere, duplicate/restoresKangZhihangdid not reportintentionally, had not reportedto the creditcenterpromptly.
也因此呢,双方争议的焦点在于两个,其一是,征信记录是否属于名誉权内容,其二则是,复康支行是故意不报,还是未及时向征信中心报告。Thesetwobehaviorshave the mistake, but the formerandlatter'sresponsibilitydegreeisobviouslydifferent.
这两种行为都有过错,但是前者和后者的责任程度是明显不同的。Latter, butmeans that otherswantto report, because ofthis and thatreason, has not reportedpromptly, youthink, the voluntary manslaughter and errordied, the discretion of punishmentis different, thatcompensation is also definitely different.
后者,只是意味着别人想报呢,但是因为这样那样的原因,没有及时地上报,那你想想,故意杀人和过失致人死亡,量刑不同,那赔偿肯定也是不同的。Thisis the core of argument!
这是争论的核心!AlthoughyellowYanhaofearedvery much, buthas the courageforcefully, cannotcomparein any caselike thisnowis worse.
尽管黄严浩心里很怕,但还是强行鼓起勇气,反正都这样了,总不能比现在更差。Thereforein view of the firstdisputefocus, hegaveowndiscusschose/point.
所以针对第一个争议焦点,他给出了自己的辩点。„Evenhas not sent the correctioninformationpromptly, because of the individual creditdatabaseis the loop system, according tocreditcenterofficial siteissue«Credit reportIntroduction», the use of credit report is only restricted in the financial institution that the commercial bank, handles the creditaccording to lawat present, withPeople's Bank!”
“就算未及时报送更正信息,因个人信用数据库系封闭系统,根据征信中心官网发布的《个人信用报告介绍》,个人信用报告的使用目前仅限于商业银行、依法办理信贷的金融机构,和人民银行!”„Naturally, the consumer can also gainowncredit reportin the personline.”
“当然,消费者也可以在人行获取到自己的信用报告。”„But, according to the difference of user, individualcredit systemprovides the credit reports of differentformat, inquired the versionandcreditcenterinterioredition of threeformatsincluding the bankversionpersonally, served the commercial bankclassfinancial institution, consumerandPeople's Bankrespectively.”
“但是,根据使用对象的不同,个人征信系统提供不同版式的个人信用报告,包括银行版、个人查询版和征信中心内部版三种版式,分别服务于商业银行类金融机构、消费者和人民银行。”„Whencommercial bank, consumerorPeople's Bank, inquiryinquirycredit reportmustobtainis inquiredperson'scomrade-in-arm, andpreservesis inquired the personal documentscopy of person, in other words the credit reportonlylimits the financialrelevant agency and message bodyoneselfinquiresanduses, when inquiryinquirycredit reportmustobtainis inquiredperson'scomrade-in-arm.”
“不管是商业银行、消费者还是人民银行,查询者查询个人信用报告时都必须取得被查询人的书面授权,且留存被查询人的身份证件复印件,也就是说个人信用报告仅限金融相关机构及信息主体本人查询和使用,查询者查询个人信用报告时都必须取得被查询人的书面授权。”„And the plaintiffhas not written up the evidenceto prove,ithas not handled the successfulcredit card , because this/shouldbadcreditrecord, becauseis unable to handle the credit card, itsreasonmany......”
“且原告方并没有出具证据证明,其未办理成功信用卡,是因为该项不良征信记录,因为无法办理信用卡,其原因很多……”„In summary, wethink that thisbadcreditwill not affect the socialappraisal of plaintiff, causes the plaintiffspiritloss and material loss, the effect fame, therefore, the plaintiffthinks that the behavior of defendantviolatesitsreputationnot to have the fact and legal basis, should notsupport!”
“综上所述,我方认为这一不良征信并不会影响原告的社会评价,导致原告精神损失、物质损失,影响声誉,因此,原告认为被告的行为侵害其名誉权没有事实和法律依据,不应支持!”Said a bigpile, the coreviewpointonly then, thisthingis very close, ifothersmustlook that mustobtainyourauthorization, therefore, will not affectyoursocialappraisal.
说了一大堆,核心观点只有一个,这东西很封闭,而且如果别人要看都得取得你的授权,因此呢,不会影响你的社会评价。Butin the opposite, Zhouresolutehas looked, was more excitedonspiritualverystimulatedsideDazhuang.
而在对面,周毅已经看出来了,原本就精神很亢奋的方大状更加兴奋了。To be honest, Zhouresolutefelt, thisyellowYanhaoleveltruly.
老实说,就连周毅都觉得,这位黄严浩的水平确实还可以。sideDazhuangopens the mouthto sayfinally: „Defendantargued, individualcreditwas extremely close, will only servesuchseveralsituations, thereforedid not affectindividualreputation/honorary, Ithink that was notthis.”
方大状终于开口道:“被告所辩称说,个人征信极其封闭,只会服务于那么几种情况,所以不影响个人名誉,我认为并不是这样。”„The essence that credit systemhaswhatis, displaysindividualhonestcredibilityappraisal, if the creditbadrecordis unable to manifestindividualhonestcredibility, thatasked that whatsignificance the so-calledcreditrecordalsodoes have?”
“征信系统存在的本质是什么呢,就是表现个人诚信度评价的,如果征信不良记录都无法体现个人的诚信度,那试问所谓的征信记录还有什么意义吗?”
„ Howeverindividualhonestcredibilityappraisal, is an extremelyimportant component of socialappraisal, sincethatappraisesas the society, howalsopossiblyisn't the reputation?
“而个人诚信度评价,便是社会评价的一个极其重要组成部分,那么既然作为社会评价,又怎么可能不是名誉权呢?„Howeveraccording to«Individual creditInformation infrastructureData bank administrationTentative method»sixth, the commercial bankmustobserve the individual creditdatabasestandard and relatedrequest that People's Bankissues, accurately, completelyandpromptlytoindividual creditdatabasesendingindividual creditinformation.”
“而根据《个人信用信息基础数据库管理暂行办法》第六条,商业银行应当遵守人民银行发布的个人信用数据库标准及其有关要求,准确、完整、及时地向个人信用数据库报送个人信用信息。”„However the defensehas not achieved the relatedrequestvery muchobviously!”
“而被告方很显然没有做到相关要求!”
To display comments and comment, click at the button
Comments for Chapter #385 Part 2: I and Teacher side 55 open, I also win him frequently